top of page

Handcuffing: Necessity Or Violation Of Rights?

  • Writer: Advocate Anil Lalla
    Advocate Anil Lalla
  • Jan 17
  • 2 min read
Handcuffing: Necessity Or Violation Of Rights?
Handcuffing: Necessity Or Violation Of Rights?

Handcuffing is a complex issue that balances security needs with fundamental

human rights in the Indian legal system. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) and

judicial precedents provide nuanced guidelines for its use.Legal FrameworkSection

43 of the BNSS allows handcuffing under specific circumstances, such as:

• High-risk offenders

• Individuals with a history of escape

• Cases involving serious crimes like terrorism, murder, and sexual

offenses

Constitutional PerspectiveThe Supreme Court has consistently emphasized that

handcuffing is a violation of fundamental rights, particularly:

• Article 21: Right to life and personal liberty

• Article 14: Right to equality

• Article 19: Freedom of movement

Judicial GuidelinesKey Supreme Court guidelines include:

• Handcuffing must be the exception, not the rule

• Requires judicial approval

• Must be justified by a compelling security need

• Should preserve human dignity

Conclusion: While handcuffing can be necessary for security, it must be applied

sparingly and with strict judicial oversight to prevent arbitrary infringement of

individual rights.

Specific circumstances under which handcuffing is justified:

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) allows handcuffing under specific, limited

circumstances:

Justified Circumstances for Handcuffing

Escape Risk

Reasonable apprehension that the accused may attempt to escape

Strong inference of potential flight risk

Violent Behavior

Exhibiting violent behavior that threatens:

Themselves

Law enforcement officials

Other individuals

Specific Offender Categories

Handcuffing may be permitted for individuals who:

Are chronic or repeat offenders

Have previously absconded from custody

Committed serious crimes such as:

Terrorist acts

Murder

Rape

Drug-related crimes

Trafficking

Sexual offenses against children.

Critical Conditions

The Supreme Court emphasizes that handcuffing must:

Be the exception, not the rule

Require judicial approval

Have documented justification

Be used only when absolutely necessary.

Importantly, merely committing a serious offense does not automatically justify

handcuffing. There must be tangible evidence of escape risk or dangerous

behavior.


Please give your views on this.


Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page